ABC and 3D: opportunities and obstacles to 3D printing in special education environments

Author(s)

  • Erin Buehler
  • Shaun Kane
  • Amy Hurst

Reference

E. Buehler, S. K. Kane, and A. Hurst, “ABC and 3D: opportunities and obstacles to 3D printing in special education environments,” in Proc. ASSETS’14, 2014, pp. 107–114.

Applied research areas

Thematic issues

Impairment

Geographical areas

Author's summary

Consumer-grade digital fabrication such as 3D printing is on the rise, and we believe it can be leveraged to great benefit in the arena of special education. Although 3D printing is beginning to infiltrate mainstream education, little to no research has explored 3D printing in the context of students with special support needs. We present a formative study exploring the use of 3D printing at three locations serving populations with varying ability, including individuals with cognitive, motor, and visual impairments. We found that 3D design and printing performs three functions in special education: developing 3D design and printing skills encourages STEM engagement; 3D printing can support the creation of educational aids for providing accessible curriculum content; and 3D printing can be used to create custom adaptive devices. In addition to providing opportunities to students, faculty, and caregivers in their efforts to integrate 3D printing in special education settings, our investigation also revealed several concerns and challenges. We present our investigation at three diverse sites as a case study of 3D printing in the realm of special education, discuss obstacles to efficient 3D printing in this context, and offer suggestions for designers and technologists.

Resource Center comment

Cet article est au sujet de l’impression 3D. Les auteurs ont montré que l’impression 3D encourage l’engagement STEM (Science, Technologie, Ingénierie et Math), soutient la création d’outils pour transmettre le contenu pédagogique de manière accessible et permet de créer des dispositifs d’adaptation personnalisée. 
Les auteurs ont utilisé deux types méthodes : observation et entretiens auprès des enseignants et d’élèves atteints de troubles cognitifs, moteurs et visuels. 
En conclusion, les auteurs donnent des recommandations pour le matériel et les logiciels 3D pour les écoles et intervenants extérieurs. Par exemple : encourager le partage de modèles existants, considérer la courbe d’apprentissage, budgéter le temps d’entraînement nécessaire pour les formateurs à ces technologies, etc. 
Ces travaux de recherche vont eux aussi dans le sens de notre hypothèse.